Use
highlighters -
Take note of any and all points of interest in the text. If you've got a
thesis in mind already, use several different colors of highlighter, each for
information relevant to a separate prong of your argument. This will make your
life much easier when you go back to integrate your sources, particularly if
you've got an extensive amount of text to cover.
Look
for patterns - Be aware of recurring techniques-both literary
and rhetorical-which the author uses to illustrate a concept. Specific sorts
of imagery, allusion, or dialogue, which seem to be similar or related
inevitably, reveal a larger intention that can be made into an argument.
Ask
questions -
In expository work, continually ask yourself "Is this true? What
evidence supports this statement? Can other conclusions be drawn from the
facts of this text?" By deciding whether or not you agree with the
arguments of your source, you'll begin to crystallize more subtle arguments of
your own. In literature, question the author's purpose in using particular
narrative structures. "Why is this metaphor used? What does the
comparison signify? Why do we learn this particular piece of information in
such a manner? Why is the setting dwelled on so much in this passage? What is
the relationship between setting and character?” Write these questions
in the margins as you go along.
Get
down to the details - One of the most
sophisticated close reading techniques you can incorporate into your work is
an analysis of the multiple connotations of a specific word. Be aware of every
single word the author uses. When you find one of particular interest,
literally look it up in the dictionary and consider how each and every
definition might be applied to the text. Even if the author uses it with one
literal definition in mind, see if the connotations of the other definitions
can be applied to your idea (This is particularly true of Shakespeare).
Consider
the source in relation to other texts - If
something in the work reminds you of something else you've read, there's quite
possibly a good reason why. Consider how your source is a response to or a
continuation of other texts. Always be on the look out for Christ symbolism
and Greek mythological allusions; both are fairly easy to spot and can be
effectively analyzed in support of a particular interpretation.
An
Example:
From
Coleridge's Kubla Kahn: "In Xanadu did Kubla Kahn a
pleasure dome decree; Where Alph the sacred river ran through caverns
measureless to man; into a sunless sea."
Your
assignment is to write about how the poem illustrates the power of human
creativity. In light of this, here are some questions to ask yourself right
off the bat:
-
Why
does Coleridge select an Oriental locale and a historical figure to open
his work?
-
What
is the significance of the word "pleasure,"
"measureless," "sunless"?
-
What
is Alph, and does Coleridge use it as the setting for his poem?
Answering
these questions might involve a consideration of distance, in both time and
space, related to the vastness of human capacity. You might also consider
"measureless" and "sunless" as descriptive
of types of knowledge or ignorance; in breaching the "sunless"
sea with his dome, what sort of power is Kubla Kahn exhibiting? A trip to
the dictionary (or, more likely, a glance at the inevitable foot note)
will provide the information that the Alph is a magical river in mythology.
This begs the question, "how does a fantastic setting relate to
Coleridge's view of the imagination?”